Archive for the ‘Marketing Trends and News’ Category

Social Media Reality Check

Monday, June 15th, 2009

June 09, 2009 
By Paul Gunning

Twitter handle? Registered—and tweeting who knows what. Facebook fan page? Created—and desperately seeking fans. Now what, exactly, do these things do for my brand?

Plenty of companies rush into the social-media space, if only to “be there.”
They suffer from what we call “techno-ecstasy,” a supreme love of newly developed technology. It’s a constant obsession with the newest, shiniest online toys combined with the fear of being left behind. Most often, it’s the technology itself people are enamored with, not the business problems these advancements could solve. These platforms come and go, and the graveyards of lost applications build up, but our business goals get put on the back burner.

We no longer ask if tactics make sense for our brand, if they’re beneficial to our consumers, or if the enterprise is capable of delivering on the promise.

Now more than ever, we’re seeing brands rush head-on into the social-media space, staking their claim on their Twitter,Flickr and Facebook kingdoms, excited about what can be done versus what should be done. In the case of microblogging there are huge differences between brands that do and do not get it. The successful ones engage users on an individual basis and humanize the company with various levels of participation within the organization. On the other hand, some brands deliver mostly broadcast messages regarding promotions or announcements, with little interaction among followers.

But how do you know if you’ve been afflicted with techno-ecstasy? Start by asking these questions:


1. Am I focused on using the social realm to listen to and learn more about my consumers, or am I more focused on executing a fan page?

2. How much participation is required to make a difference on my brand? Does adding 4,600 “friends” have any impact on this goal? Is this scalable to the level I need?

3. Has my company trained CSR, legal, HR and sales on our social-media strategy, or has only the marcom department received a social-media 101 session?

Trust me, I’m not discouraging the appetite to keep up with new innovations. They’ll undoubtedly effect profound changes in how our brands start and continue relationships with customers. But there’s no need to be blinded by techno-ecstasy.

To help you navigate the social-media space, here are four phases of a social strategy:

1. Listen. The most important thing to remember brings us back to marketing basics: Listen to your consumer. Social media is the perfect place to leverage what your audience is already saying. Executing a pretty fan page won’t do your brand any good if you aren’t listening to what consumers are asking for.

This should be the first and most supported phase. Even if you have to stop there, it’s OK.

2. Understand. Social media is not necessarily a popularity contest. Your friends or followers may have zero impact on your brand if they’re not the audience you’re seeking. Instead of racing to add more friends, focus on developing meaningful one-on-one relationships with your existing, most loyal fans.

Back up and ask yourself if your goals within social media (e.g., adding fans) are aligned with the business, brand and consumer goals.

3. Participate. Social media is not simply a marketing channel to broadcast campaigns and promotions. It’s also an invaluable relationship building tool, given the individualized nature of the medium. People spend time on social networks to connect with other people so engage your consumers as individuals, not a mass voice. Customers respond more to brands that have real transparency and act as brand ambassadors.

4. Harness. The place to focus your presence in social media is to graph your fan base. We’re not talking about painting word clouds or counting tweets. We’re talking about a serious deep dive into what your consumers think about your category and your brand. Although social media is the product of technology and we’re used to quantitative metrics in the digital space, you’ll get more out of analyzing this realm with a human approach. After all, how does one quantify the feeling and emotion abounding from a conversation? We’ve even mined the human conversations occurring in social media with the methodology of a cultural anthropologist.

Engaging in social media will likely spark customer service and, potentially, legal issues. Make sure your enterprise is involved to ensure every point of the customer experience is positive.

Social media isn’t just another marketing channel; it can be an effective CRM tool as well. If you really want consumer advocates, be ready.

Paul Gunning is CEO of Tribal DDB Worldwide. 

Source: Adweek

Using the Recession as an Opportunity

Monday, June 15th, 2009

Using the Recession as an Opportunity
May 14, 2009
By Nielsenwire Staff

A primary theme of the high-energy general session on Day Two of the Nielsen Consumer360 conference was encouraging attendees to use the current recession as a learning opportunity, in order to build better relationships with consumers and/or reinvent business models.

From Nielsen’s James Russo, there was talk of the fact that great companies such as GE, Disney, Microsoft, and HP were started during economic downturns. And, he felt that consumers may soon be spending more, albeit with some restraint. Signs of the recession were everywhere, from a global reduction in out of home entertainment expenditures, to canning and freezing supplies being a top growth category, to a slowing of growth in health and wellness and organics. Home has become the new “center.”

Kraft’s Nick Sorvillo said his company has multiple online consumer panels that tell them that consumers are looking for control and security in their lives. They have discovered new priorities and advantages from living simpler lives—Sorvillo called this “brightsiding.” As 72 percent of shoppers surveyed said they will continue using new shopping strategies when the economy improves, Kraft has gone about reconnecting with consumers and becoming a dependable, valuable source of help—providing recipes by e-mail, recipe widgets, and an iPhone assistant app that, having launched ten months ago, is in the top 50 iPhone apps.

Malcolm Gladwell, author of “The Tipping Point,” “Blink,” and his new book, “Outliers,” said that the recession offers us a chance to rethink assumptions and bad habits accumulated over many years. To him, successful people are aware of their limitations and work harder to overcome them. He noted that some things that we see as advantages, such as small school class sizes, are not necessarily so. For example, many Asian countries that have great educational systems have large class sizes. In essence, one of this theories is that making it too easy for people spoils them and actually inhibits success. In that light, he sees the current poor economy as perhaps providing a highway to creativity—nothing like a crisis to focus the mind.

Ken Romanzi discussed the revitalization of Ocean Spray, as over the past few years the company has jump started sales by educating consumers that their products taste good, and are good for them. Ocean Spray embarked on a heavy P.R. and marketing campaign to reintroduce the cranberry to U.S. consumers, showcasing their products’ heritage, and linking their products to various holidays and celebrations.

Nielsen’s Chairman and CEO, Dave Calhoun, said he has been amazed at the resilience of consumers, as their spending on food and fuel held up until the liquidity crunch of last September. He sees another 12 months’ or so of turmoil and said an important signal will be what consumers are going to do about saving, as so far most of the growth in savings has been involuntary, due to the reduced availability of credit.

All in all, it was an enlightening and entertaining morning—with every bad economic statistic seemingly offset by the notion that the current downturn was eventually going to go away, and until then we have an opportunity to rethink how and what we’re doing. It was also great to see many speakers at the conference using video and audio clips of consumers—giving us much more than just charts and statistics.

Many of the videos of the sessions at Consumer 360 are available on demand at Consumer360.com.

Source: Nielsenwire.com

Making commercials for the web - from Seth Godin’s Blog

Monday, April 27th, 2009

TV advertisers are finally discovering that YouTube + viral imagination = free media.

The good news for you is that money is not a barrier, which means that marketers of any size can play. But the rules are different, as they always are online.

Because media is free but attention is not (this is flipped from TV world) you need to make a different sort of ad for a different sort of audience.

1. Assume that the viewer has the attention span of an espresso-crazed fruitfly. That means slapstick, quick cuts and velocity.

2. Find a word or phrase that you can own in Google, that fits in an email, and that comes up in discussion at the cafeteria table or in the playground.

Castrol gets both rules right in this inane commercial.

3. Length doesn’t matter. 10 seconds is fine and so is five minutes. Media is free, remember?

4. Challenge the status quo, be provocative, touch a social nerve or create some other sort of interesting conversation. In other words, a commercial worth watching.

Dove does both in this now-famous commercial.

Because of the power of free media, I expect to see a whole host of commercials that would never be deemed effective enough to spend big media money on, but that generate huge views online. Look for plenty of irrelevant slogans and catch phrases and off strategy content… anything for an eyeball.

Also, understand that this is out of your control. Once launched, what happens, happens. One commercial I know of caught fire and ended up with millions of views. The client then called the producer, screaming in anger. He wanted to be able to turn it off, to decide how it got used, who talked about it, etc. You can’t. Once it spreads, it belongs to the community, not to you.

The biggest shift is going to be that organizations that could never have afforded a national campaign will suddenly have one. The same way that there’s very little correlation between popular websites and big companies, we’ll see that the most popular commercials get done by little shops that have nothing to lose.

What Ashton Kutcher can teach us about the evolution of media

Friday, April 17th, 2009

Here’s a recent blog post on NiemanJournalismLab regarding the recent Ashton/Oprah/Twitter excitement.

-28-

The standard response from many people on Twitter this week to the news that Ashton Kutcher wanted to get a million followers was thinly veiled (or not-so-thinly veiled) disgust. Long-time Twitter fans were outraged that anyone — let alone a two-bit TV actor — would be so blatantly egotistical, and trivialize such a great social-media tool in that way, just so he could get on the Oprah show. Shane Richmond said that it wasn’t clear who was the bigger “Twitter tool,” Ashton or Oprah. All of these comments, of course, ignored the fact that Kutcher was using his campaign to raise money for malaria relief efforts, and has in fact raised a total of almost $1-million, according to a recent tweet.

So Ashton is more or less using Twitter as the 21st-century version of Jerry Lewis’s telethon for muscular dystrophy. That isn’t the interesting thing about his use of the social network, at least as far as I’m concerned. Far from being just an egotist who wants to take advantage of a medium to promote himself — although there could well be an aspect of grandstanding to it, as there is for many people — it seems clear that the actor has thought fairly seriously about the implications of Twitter from a media-industry standpoint (my friend Andrew Cherwenka seems to agree). And as a celebrity who is in the public eye almost all the time, he also has a somewhat unique take on the media industry and how it is being transformed.

In his video discussion with Oprah about Twitter, for example, Kutcher says he believes that “we’re at a place now with social media where a single person’s voice can be as powerful as an entire news network — that is the power of the social web.” (although obviously it helps if that one person is a celebrity). He then talks about how his life is “somewhat on display anyway, and not always by choice… so instead of them publishing pictures and videos I don’t like, I can publish pictures and video of myself… that I’m happy with. If there’s some sort of fallacy that’s out in some magazine or that some blogger has written about, you can respond to it, and you can actually respond to it in a genuine way, directly with your fans, as opposed to having to go through the whole rigamarole of publicists and so on.”

I’ve heard and read similar thoughts expressed by actress Brea Grant, one of the stars of Heroes, and others. Social-media tools allow them to go direct to their fans, just as it allows musicians to connect directly with fans, avoiding the PR machine and all the distortions that it produces. This is the same kind of media-channel disruption that allows people like billionaire Mark Cuban to post the transcripts of media interviews on his blog when his comments are taken out of context — and that allows anyone involved in a news event to tell their own version of the story, rather than the one that is constructed by the media. Ashton Kutcher may be a two-bit TV actor, and he may goof around on Twitter posting snapshots of his wife’s backside now and then, but that doesn’t mean he is wrong about how media is changing.

Darren Barefoot discusses creating your social media purple cow

Monday, April 13th, 2009

The infamous Vancouver based social media guru, Darren Barefoot, discusses how to break through and stand out in the social media realm. For some interesting ideas and examples of social media success check out this link:

http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/social-media-gimmicks/

-28-

Voter turnout will decide the BC election.

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

On May 12, your vote will matter more than ever.

I’m not a West Coaster through and through. I come from the little chunk of Canada where the people are super-duper nice but road trips take forever. That’s right, Saskatchewan!

I’m not sure how familiar you are with Prairie politics, but after a majority win in 2007, the Saskatchewan Party has successfully changed the prosperity, outlook and appeal of my favourite little province simply by providing what was necessary for the people and the economy. They took the blinders off, quit moaning and complaining and got things done.

Yes, I don’t actually live there anymore. But I do see what the new economic climate has done for my family and friends who stood by their roots and stuck through the hard times.

So why am I blabbering about this? Because, though times are better these days in sunny Saskatchewan, it’s still too darn cold there for my coastal comforts and I don’t want to return to my hometown. However, like many 30 something success seekers like me, the government we elect on May12 will have a direct impact on my future. If the power goes to those that do not understand how to effectively manage our province through the tough economic times that continue to challenge us, we may repeat history.

Simply remember where this province was in the 90’s and how much improvement and progress we have enjoyed in the past 8 years. The NDP are focusing on things like the BC Rail scandal, arrogance in Victoria and stopping privatization of BC Hydro. I would rather hear about sound economic policy, a track record of NOT ruining our Province and plans to ensure the future is bright for business in BC.

Complacency is unacceptable. Make your voice heard. It doesn’t require a multi-paragraph blog rant, as I have done above. It requires vision for the future, the understanding of who can support your goals and the will to show up on election day and VOTE.

See you there on May 12th.

-28-

On becoming proactive

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

Today’s blog post from Seth Godin is about becoming proactive in business, and he uses a homebuilder as an example. This blog post refers to an article from the Chicago Tribune. Take a read.

-28-

Tom points us to a provocative idea for home builders. If you want to sell a new house, why not offer prospective buyers help in selling their old houses? Send your idle crews to their house to paint it or do other important cosmetic fixes. Fill the old house with the furniture you use in your models, etc.

Take it a step further. If your home building service is totally slack, why not get to work upgrading and selling older homes or even foreclosed ones?

Consider what a solo entrepreneur could do using eBay: instead of waiting for people to hold garage sales, why not distribute flyers offering to run a virtual garage sale for anyone who will open their home to you? Go in with a digital camera, catalog and photograph the top 20 most valuable items in the house and sell them on eBay… and split the money. Your proactive effort overcomes the seller’s inertia and you both profit.

There are huge opportunities for this in the business to business space as well. Most companies would welcome a post-tax-day accountant who offered (on spec) to review bills or expenses in exchange for half the money saved. If they had time, they’d do it themselves, but of course they don’t.

In my experience, much of marketing is a game of waiting for the other guy to go first. Well, if nothing is happening, you go first.

First, ten

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

I subscribe to Seth Godin’sBlog. He is a great mind. I encourage you all to subscribe to his enewsletter.

This is his latest email. It picked me up and gave me the push I needed this morning. I hope it does the same for you.

-28-

________________________________________________________________________

First, ten

This, in two words, is the secret of the new marketing.

Find ten people. Ten people who trust you/respect you/need you/listen to you…

Those ten people need what you have to sell, or want it. And if they love it, you win. If they love it, they’ll each find you ten more people (or a hundred or a thousand or, perhaps, just three). Repeat.

If they don’t love it, you need a new product. Start over.

Your idea spreads. Your business grows. Not as fast as you want, but faster than you could ever imagine.

This approach changes the posture and timing of everything you do.

You can no longer market to the anonymous masses. They’re not anonymous and they’re not masses. You can only market to people who are willing participants. Like this group of ten.

The timing means that the idea of a ‘launch’ and press releases and the big unveiling is nuts. Instead, plan on the gradual build that turns into a tidal wave. Organize for it and spend money appropriately. The fact is, the curve of money spent (big hump, then it tails off) is precisely backwards to what you actually need.

Three years from now, this advice will be so common as to be boring. Today, it’s almost certainly the opposite of what you’re doing.

Real Estate Marketing versus Real Estate Sales

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

- reposted blog entry from angelaalbright.com

I have spent a number of years in the ad agency world; where clients pay big bucks for sound marketing strategies that require considerable time and money to execute. I then entered the real estate world as a Marketing Director and realized how sales-focused the industry was.

It makes sense. It IS an industry built on relationships and face-to-face sales. The challenge is to take the time, do the research and find the money to make the project a success. The stakes are high and time is of the essence in real estate. The market is fickle and constantly evolving. The project sales cycles are generally too short to truly foster a brand, and in a lot of cases it’s hard to justify the necessary financial investment in something that has a limited life and no guarantees.

Reading this post on Angela’s blog (originating as an article by Greg Herder of Hobbs Herder)  I was inspired to repost it here. She’s right, it is a bit of a read, but it does effectively reinforce the value of strategic marketing in the world of real estate… my two favourite topics.

Enjoy

 

-28-

 

Do You Think Like a Salesperson or a Marketing Professional, by Greg Herder 

Understanding the huge difference between sales and marketing is the first step to becoming a great marketer.

Greg examines the chasm that separates these interrelated, yet vastly different disciplines. Working with real estate sales people day after day, I see a huge waste of time, money and energy that comes as a direct result of agents thinking like a salesperson instead of a marketing professional. Unfortunately, most agents have no formal training about what marketing is and how it relates to their sales activities. While most agents have gone through a significant amount of sales training, the sales training they get revolves around classic sales skills that assume that face-to-face selling skills are all you need to succeed as a real estate agent. This training doesn’t cover the impact that marketing has on the overall success of an agent.

The reality is that most real estate trainers do not have a marketing education or come from a marketing background. They were successful sales people that enjoyed training and/or management and teach agents what they did to succeed as a salesperson. So, what is the difference between sales and marketing and why is it important that you understand it?

The classic definition of marketing is that it is the total of all activities involved in the transfer of goods from the producer or seller to the consumer or buyer, including market selection, product or service features, design, packaging, branding, advertising, shipping, storing, selling, delivery and post-sale customer service. Selling is one step out of the complete marketing process and is usually defined as a salespersons’ actions that are used to persuade or induce (someone) to buy something when they are face to face or on the phone with a prospect.

How Marketing Works Think about companies like Proctor & Gamble, which relies purely on the marketing process to persuade people to buy their products. When was the last time you walked into a store to buy a Proctor & Gamble product and a P&G salesperson tried to close you on buying Crest, Tide or any other P&G product? P&G relies on the impact of their marketing and advertising to create a buyer who walks into the store predisposed to buying Crest or Tide.

Classic sales methods were designed to work without any marketing support. From the early-1930s to the late-1970s, there were countless direct sales people who sold aluminum siding, cookware, encyclopedias, vacuums and a myriad of other goods, simply by knocking on doors and then closing. Supporting Your Sales Function By the early ’80s, two-income households were the norm and people became less tolerant of door-to-door sales, and most pure direct sales companies disappeared. The companies that survived were the ones that found a way to give their sales people marketing support – companies like Avon, Tupperware, Amway, Herbalife and others.

These companies’ marketing activities created demand for the products that their salespeople sold, making the salespeople more productive. They also moved from door-to-door selling to home parties, group meetings, seminar selling and other methods that combined marketing with selling. The old-school idea of a salesperson was someone who could sell icemakers to Eskimos based on their charismatic personality and closing skills. I remember one of the real estate sales training seminars I attended in the 1970s was titled “How to Convince Anyone to Sell their Home Anytime.” It was a hardcore sales script using a combination of fear and humiliation to make people sign a listing on the spot. I remember the trainer telling us, “Remember, this presentation works on average one out of every 25 times you use it, and it will also get you thrown out one out of every 25 times.” At this point I realized that if this what being a real estate agent was all about, that I would never make it. I believed there had to be a different way to persuade people to do business with me. A Better Approach to Building a Business In Marketing, I found what I believed was a better, more professional method for succeeding in real estate.

The secret to marketing is strategic thinking, planning and execution. You have to pick a target market that you have a passion for. Develop a point of differentiation and marketing message that makes it easy for prospects to remember you so that you can drive your personal brand into their consciousness.This predisposes them to calling you when they have a need to buy or sell a home.

Finally, you have to execute your plan. Your marketing plan shows exactly what is going to be mailed and when, what ads to run and in what publications, what support materials to send out when people do call, the follow-up mailing plan to convert leads into clients and your service plan that shows how they are going to be treated. This requires an agent to make lots of difficult decisions and trade-offs, and to develop the patience to let the marketing plan run long enough to actually start working – which is normally nine to 12 months. To Build a Business, Resist the Lure of Instant Gratification Instant gratification: the problem that too many sales people get bogged down in the marketing process. The number of decisions and sacrifices they must make overwhelms them, and so does the cost associated with developing all of the pieces needed to execute a plan. Finally they struggle to actually execute the plan consistently over time. As the decisions, organizational details and costs of building a marketing campaign bury them, the lure of getting the instant gratification of a sale starts to pull their focus away from marketing and turn it toward short-term sales activities like working FSBOs, cold calling for an hour a day and door knocking from 6 to 7 each night. Why waste all that time and money on marketing when you can just go out and cold call expireds?

This is why I believe the majority of agents end up failing in real estate and those who do survive simply hang on for 10 years until the referrals from their past client base start to kick in and they finally make a decent living. Along the way, most agents end up trying some sales gimmicks that a trainer or manager they know referred to as marketing. The litany is endless: mailing free CMA flyers, holding a raffle for a new TV, car or other prize, giving away flags on the 4th of July, pumpkins at Halloween, notepads, pens, chip clips, calendars, and a host of other promotional stuff agents give away.

Recently I was asked to judge a special marketing meeting for a large company that had a number of offices. Agents had been asked to bring their best marketing concept to this meeting and share in front of all the offices. Three mangers and I were asked to pick the winner from what we saw presented. Sales Gimmicks Are Not Real Marketing I was totally dismayed as agent after agent got up and presented some sales gimmick, open house invitations with cute bunnies, mailing out half a dollar bill and promising the other half if they would come by an open house, paper weights, magnets, beautiful presentation packages to give to FSBOs and expireds. During a break, the owner came up and asked me “What do you think is the best marketing concept you have seen so far?” I told him that I had not seen a single marketing concept during the first two hours. I explained that what I had seen was a bunch of short-term-oriented sales gimmicks that no matter how clever or cute, were hit or miss pieces at best.

I realized that most agents think sending out a flyer or giving away a note pad is marketing, and that is why most of them become disillusioned with marketing and why most end up failing. A great real estate marketer starts by looking at two things.

First, the marketplace they are in and, second, their skill set and personality. Then they, based on who they are, determine what segment of the market is most likely to relate best to their personality. They then look for their unique marketing proposition. A UMP should be something that is very hard for your competition to copy and something that you find naturally exciting and compelling. Then you need to take that and turn it into a personal logo; a graphic design that you will use in every single piece of your marketing. Then go to work on creating a basic brand message that will be used to differentiate and make you memorable in your client’s mind. This all takes time, money, focus and it’s hard work. In many ways it’s like growing crops. You have to analyze the soil, select the right crop to grow in that soil, add fertilizer, plant your seeds, water it, weed it and care for it during the spring and summer. All this is done so that when the fall rolls around you have something significant to harvest.

Commitment is Key The most frequent question I have been asked over the last 22 years is something like this: “I can see how marketing is the way to go, and I really want to build my business through marketing, but how can I get started without limiting my options by having to actually pick a niche and by spending almost no money?” It is like a farmer saying, “Well, I don’t really want to commit to growing corn, because I know the wheat market could be good next year, and I really like beans as well, so I think what I will do is plant my field with mixture of seeds from the five crops I think will get me the best price next year.”

We know the outcome will end up in failure, but we get to avoid having to make the difficult decisions that must be made. Yes, you can succeed through a pure sales approach to real estate. Every now and then, I meet one of those incredibly rare, totally disciplined selling machines, who doesn’t get burned out using some script to try and close prospect after prospect. But they are very few and far between. What’s Your 10-Year Plan? I tell people in the long run it is better to go back and get a salaried job for awhile, save up $15,000 to $20,000 to invest in executing a marketing campaign and then do real estate the right way. If you were advising your teenager who just graduated from high school whether they should go to college or not, even if it meant working part-time, borrowing money and struggling a little bit, would you advise them to go out and get a job as soon as they could because it is going to make them more money today?

Ten years from now your life will be determined by the choices you make today. The question is really simple: Which approach to real estate will ensure your life will be what you want it to be 10 years from now? The direct-prospecting person plan or the marketing professional plan?